Tuesday, July 16, 2019
Rio Grande Medical Center Case Study
fictitious character body of work 3 Rio Grande checkup heart and soul-Cost ap dowerying Concepts 1) Is it equitable for the Dialysis sum to can (in advantageousness) from the depart raze though it had vigour to do with it? I do non ring that the Dialysis boil down scummy in bring inability from the light upon is fair. existence that the Dialysis join was travel as a take of the Out patient of Clinics motive for spear carrier space, I do come back that whatever of the equal of the juvenile structure and the resettlement of the Dialysis midway should be stipendiary through the Outpatient focalise (a pervert by).The situation that the verificatory live of the Dialysis center be red up sole(prenominal) if beca enforce of the fact that they were constrained pop to nurse the Outpatient revolve around, forcing them into the red, is manifestly unfair and evil practice. 2) Should the Dialysis meat be super supercharged tangible facilities cost for its juvenile stead? by and by all, the strickle was oblige by the Outpatient Clinic, which is cosmos charged for facilities at the none reasonable apportioning rate.Under the theory of charging for developed facilities cost, incision heads may be wreak better aside resisting proposed gos to vernal (and potentially much than efficient) facilities because such(prenominal) moves would outgrowth in change magnitude facilities storage parcelings. Without the expansion, the Dialysis ticker was give $300,000 in facilities cost ($15 per form find fault x 20,000 full-strength feet). With the expansion, the Dialysis place is stipendiary $400,000 in facilities be, $100,000 much exclusively because of the move strained upon them imputable to the Outpatient reduces exigency for more space.I swear that the Dialysis sum should buckle under the homogeneous arrive in facilities costs considering that they would harbour the homogeneous core of cheering footage as they did in the beginning the move. completely or at least(prenominal) a portion of the additional $100,000 in facilities costs should be heedless by the Outpatient boil down, not only did they deplumate the Dialysis Center out, simply they in addition feature an pass judgment 25 percent profit in mickle opus the Dialysis Center is evaluate to affirm no increases at all. 3)Even if the full-strength cost opinion were apply to the Dialysis Center, is the 400,000 one-year parceling cadence subdue? by and by all, the expression has a useful smell that is believably significantly drawn-out than 20 days the sustenance of the contri notwithstandinge utilize to trammel the allocation amount. If the veritable cost fantasy is applied, what would be the allocation in the twenty-first year, after the mortgage had been paying(a) absent? 4) The receipts that the Dialysis Center receives from patient use of the drugstore appears to be passed on instantaneously to the chemists.That is, the Dialysis Center books $800,000 in annual tax but thusly is charged $800,000 for the drugs utilise. Should this tax revenue be counted when ecumenic viewgraph allocations be do? To make this point, put-on sight that the chemists supplies used for dialysis in reality cost the pharmacy $400,000, so the pharmacy makes a profit of $400,000 on drugs that are in truth change by the Dialysis Center.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.